Russian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
COMPARE
Russian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Disability
Disability Comparison
Russians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
11.5%
DISABILITY
86.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
DISABILITY
69.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,171,933 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.569 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,728,715 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 5.2% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 20.5% |
| Range | 74.5% | 15.3% |
| Mean | 15.4% | 11.4% |
| Median | 11.6% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are New Zealander (11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Grenada (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sudan (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Moroccan (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Fiji (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Netherlands (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ghana (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Guatemala (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Kenya (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| New Zealanders | 87.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.5% |
| Ghanaians | 87.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.5% |
| Russians | 86.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 86.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 85.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.5% |
| Moroccans | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.5% |
| Australians | 82.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 11.5% |
| Nigerians | 81.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 79.0 /100 | #146 | Good 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 77.6 /100 | #147 | Good 11.5% |
| Sudanese | 77.1 /100 | #148 | Good 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 73.2 /100 | #149 | Good 11.6% |
| Romanians | 72.7 /100 | #150 | Good 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 72.1 /100 | #151 | Good 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 72.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 71.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 71.1 /100 | #154 | Good 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 69.8 /100 | #155 | Good 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 69.5 /100 | #156 | Good 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 11.6% |
| Armenians | 65.9 /100 | #158 | Good 11.6% |