Pueblo vs Kiowa Vision Disability
COMPARE
Pueblo
Kiowa
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Pueblo
Kiowa
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo vs Kiowa Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,045,963 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,085,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 2.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pueblo | Kiowa |
Minimum | 0.28% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 17.5% | 15.0% |
Range | 17.3% | 13.4% |
Mean | 5.0% | 5.1% |
Median | 4.0% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 4.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Pueblo and Kiowa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Pima (3.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.6%), Houma (3.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Pima (3.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |