Potawatomi vs Tsimshian Disability
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Tsimshian
Disability
Disability Comparison
Potawatomi
Tsimshian
14.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Tsimshian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,767,457 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 13.8%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Potawatomi | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 9.9% | 9.0% |
| Maximum | 33.1% | 30.5% |
| Range | 23.2% | 21.5% |
| Mean | 19.0% | 18.5% |
| Median | 18.5% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 24.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Tsimshian by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Ottawa (14.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Navajo (14.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Puerto Rican (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 2.2%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 3.5%), Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.1% |