Polish vs Greek Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Polish
Greek
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Poles
Greeks
16.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Greek Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,438,383 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,712,046 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 0.27%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Greek |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 49.3% | 50.0% |
| Range | 44.9% | 48.5% |
| Mean | 16.4% | 16.4% |
| Median | 15.0% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.4% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Greeks by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Pakistan (16.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Croatia (16.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Filipino (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Luxembourger (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Slovak (16.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Italian (16.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Russian (16.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Slovene (16.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Israel (16.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Russians | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Cubans | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Hungarians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 16.5% |