Palestinian vs Scottish Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Palestinian
Scottish
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Palestinians
Scottish
16.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Scottish Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,464,983 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,987,666 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 0.68%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Scottish |
Minimum | 7.6% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 21.7% | 50.0% |
Range | 14.1% | 47.9% |
Mean | 15.5% | 18.2% |
Median | 16.0% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 20.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Scottish by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Paraguayan (16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (16.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Irish (16.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Northern European (16.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (16.8%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from China (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Denmark (16.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Japan (16.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Irish | 98.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Paraguayans | 98.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Palestinians | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 97.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Canadians | 97.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Albanians | 97.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |