Pakistani vs Ecuadorian Female Disability
COMPARE
Pakistani
Ecuadorian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Pakistanis
Ecuadorians
12.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Ecuadorian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,294,894 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,804,285 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 0.92%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Ecuadorian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 18.9% |
| Range | 29.3% | 14.7% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 11.1% |
| Median | 13.0% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Ecuadorians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Nigerian (12.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Kenya (12.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (12.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Moldova (12.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Estonian (12.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Norway (11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Ugandan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Central American (11.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Kenyan (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.6 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Kenyans | 94.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 94.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Central Americans | 94.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ugandans | 94.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 93.8 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |