Norwegian vs South American Indian Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Norwegian
South American Indian
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Norwegians
South American Indians
22.5%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.1%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
65.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs South American Indian Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,492,634 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 22.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,502,257 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 23.1%, a difference of 2.8%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | South American Indian |
Minimum | 7.1% | 8.3% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 52.2% |
Range | 59.5% | 43.8% |
Mean | 24.8% | 24.5% |
Median | 22.4% | 22.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.1% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 12.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 65 to 74
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Western Europe (22.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Lebanese (22.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Slovak (22.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Hungarian (22.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Czech (22.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Swedes | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 22.4% |
Austrians | 94.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 22.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 94.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 22.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 93.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 22.4% |
Czechs | 93.5 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 22.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 93.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 22.4% |
Hungarians | 93.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 22.4% |
Norwegians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 22.5% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.3 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 22.5% |
Lebanese | 92.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 22.5% |
Slovaks | 91.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 22.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 22.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 90.1 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 22.6% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Excellent 22.6% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Korean (23.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cameroon (23.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Vietnam (23.1%, a difference of 0.24%), European (23.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Philippines (23.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Finns | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 22.9% |
Slavs | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 23.0% |
Sri Lankans | 74.0 /100 | #154 | Good 23.0% |
British | 73.9 /100 | #155 | Good 23.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 73.8 /100 | #156 | Good 23.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 72.4 /100 | #157 | Good 23.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 23.1% |
South American Indians | 65.5 /100 | #159 | Good 23.1% |
Koreans | 64.2 /100 | #160 | Good 23.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 63.8 /100 | #161 | Good 23.1% |
Europeans | 61.2 /100 | #162 | Good 23.2% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 61.1 /100 | #163 | Good 23.2% |
Sierra Leoneans | 60.9 /100 | #164 | Good 23.2% |
Vietnamese | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 23.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 23.2% |