Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Nicaraguans
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
63.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
52.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,681,314 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,292,594 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.61%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nicaraguan | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Minimum | 2.0% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 9.8% | 11.0% |
Range | 7.8% | 8.0% |
Mean | 5.8% | 6.6% |
Median | 5.9% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 7.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Oceania (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Lebanese (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Moroccan (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |