Navajo vs Lumbee Disability
COMPARE
Navajo
Lumbee
Disability
Disability Comparison
Navajo
Lumbee
14.3%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Lumbee Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,790,018 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,289,178 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 8.9%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Navajo | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 41.2% | 41.7% |
| Range | 39.9% | 37.8% |
| Mean | 16.4% | 19.4% |
| Median | 15.8% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 21.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo and Lumbee by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 0.59%), Ottawa (14.2%, a difference of 0.71%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.71%), Osage (14.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 0.47%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 0.84%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |