Mexican vs Ute Female Disability
COMPARE
Mexican
Ute
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Mexicans
Ute
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
14.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican vs Ute Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,937,802 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,679 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.070%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican | Ute |
Minimum | 9.3% | 7.1% |
Maximum | 15.1% | 35.7% |
Range | 5.8% | 28.7% |
Mean | 12.4% | 15.9% |
Median | 12.5% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 19.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Mexicans and Ute by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Swiss (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Basque (12.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Swiss (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Samoan (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 22.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 12.3% |
Chinese | 22.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 12.3% |
Somalis | 21.5 /100 | #202 | Fair 12.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 21.1 /100 | #203 | Fair 12.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 20.9 /100 | #204 | Fair 12.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |
Europeans | 12.1 /100 | #219 | Poor 12.4% |
Bahamians | 11.1 /100 | #220 | Poor 12.4% |