Mexican American Indian vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Subsaharan African
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,438,641 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,474,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.16% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 20.9% | 9.3% |
| Range | 20.8% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 3.4% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.7% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Sub-Saharan Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belize (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Jamaican (2.4%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |