Marshallese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability Age Under 5

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,862,689 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565 and weighted average of 0.94%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,701,404 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.458 and weighted average of 1.0%, a difference of 9.7%.

Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Marshallese	Immigrants from South Central Asia
Minimum	0.44%	0.13%
Maximum	3.4%	2.5%
Range	3.0%	2.3%
Mean	1.4%	1.0%
Median	1.3%	0.97%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	0.56%	0.72%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	1.8%	1.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.2%	0.59%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	1.0%	0.45%
Standard Deviation (Population)	0.94%	0.44%

Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Immigrants from South Central Asia by Disability Age Under 5

In terms of disability age under 5, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Afghan (0.94%, a difference of 0.76%), Immigrants from Grenada (0.94%, a difference of 0.78%), Soviet Union (0.95%, a difference of 0.95%), Yuman (0.95%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (0.95%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Belarus (1.0%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (1.0%, a difference of 0.65%), Guyanese (1.0%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Taiwan (1.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (1.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age Under 5
Marshallese	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 0.94%
Afghans	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 0.94%
Immigrants \| Grenada	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 0.94%
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 0.95%
Yuman	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 0.95%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 0.95%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 0.96%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 0.96%
Immigrants \| Barbados	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 0.97%
Puget Sound Salish	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 0.97%
Nepalese	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 0.97%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 0.99%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 1.00%
Yakama	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 1.00%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 1.0%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 1.0%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 1.0%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 1.0%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 1.0%
Immigrants \| Belarus	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 1.0%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.9 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 1.0%