Luxembourger vs Salvadoran Female Disability
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Salvadoran
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Luxembourgers
Salvadorans
11.6%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Salvadoran Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,677,023 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,928,715 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.448 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.88%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Salvadoran |
Minimum | 3.8% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 20.0% | 15.3% |
Range | 16.2% | 9.9% |
Mean | 10.9% | 10.6% |
Median | 11.1% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Salvadorans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Serbia (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Poland (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Jordan (11.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and Sierra Leonean (11.5%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Vietnam (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Colombian (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Chile (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from South America (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Colombians | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Chileans | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.6% |