Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Luxembourgers
Immigrants from Northern Europe
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
2.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,678,787 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 477,037,225 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.468 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 2.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
Minimum | 0.78% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 8.6% | 31.3% |
Range | 7.9% | 30.1% |
Mean | 4.0% | 5.6% |
Median | 3.5% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Immigrants from Northern Europe by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Ukrainian (3.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Greek (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Central American Indian (3.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe are Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Laos (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |