Lumbee vs Inupiat Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Lumbee
Inupiat
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Lumbee
Inupiat
32.7%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
34.5%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Inupiat Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,106,764 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 32.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,264,224 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 34.5%, a difference of 5.5%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Inupiat |
Minimum | 15.4% | 17.6% |
Maximum | 57.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.5% | 82.4% |
Mean | 36.3% | 45.8% |
Median | 37.5% | 38.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.3% | 27.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.0% | 60.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 32.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 22.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 22.4% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Inupiat by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Alaskan Athabascan (32.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Houma (32.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Navajo (33.3%, a difference of 3.6%), Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 4.3%), Tohono O'odham (36.0%, a difference of 4.3%), Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and Kiowa (32.6%, a difference of 6.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 30.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 30.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 30.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 33.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 33.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 34.5% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 37.8% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 38.6% |