Lumbee vs Cherokee Vision Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
Cherokee
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Lumbee
Cherokee
3.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Cherokee Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,245,889 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007 and weighted average of 3.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,069,891 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 16.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.90% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 7.2% | 18.9% |
Range | 6.3% | 18.1% |
Mean | 4.1% | 4.8% |
Median | 4.1% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Cherokee by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 2.7%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Spanish American (2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Native/Alaskan (3.0%, a difference of 2.0%), Yuman (3.0%, a difference of 2.5%), Apache (3.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and Colville (3.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |