Lithuanian vs Cherokee Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Cherokee
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Lithuanians
Cherokee
10.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Cherokee Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,646,297 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,305,636 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 43.0%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Cherokee |
Minimum | 2.9% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 67.6% | 61.8% |
Range | 64.7% | 57.4% |
Mean | 16.1% | 25.2% |
Median | 11.5% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 28.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Sierra Leonean (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Australian (10.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (10.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Scotland (10.7%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Navajo (15.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Cajun (15.3%, a difference of 0.75%), Pueblo (15.3%, a difference of 0.93%), Native/Alaskan (15.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.0% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |