Laotian vs South American Indian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Laotian
South American Indian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Laotians
South American Indians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs South American Indian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,832,654 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,558,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.57% | 0.098% |
Maximum | 8.6% | 16.3% |
Range | 8.0% | 16.2% |
Mean | 3.7% | 4.1% |
Median | 3.1% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.5% | 4.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and South American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |