Korean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
COMPARE
Korean
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Disability Comparison
Koreans
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
11.3%
DISABILITY
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,851,171 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,454,618 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Minimum | 4.6% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 24.5% | 37.8% |
| Range | 20.0% | 35.2% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 13.1% |
| Median | 11.3% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Luxembourger (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Philippines (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Syria (11.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Guyanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (11.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (11.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 96.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 96.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 96.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 96.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 96.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 95.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 94.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Guyanese | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 93.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.3% |