Kenyan vs Brazilian Disability
COMPARE
Kenyan
Brazilian
Disability
Disability Comparison
Kenyans
Brazilians
11.5%
DISABILITY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
DISABILITY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Brazilian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,214,038 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,954,129 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.83%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kenyan | Brazilian |
Minimum | 5.9% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 23.5% |
Range | 20.3% | 21.8% |
Mean | 12.7% | 11.9% |
Median | 11.3% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Brazilians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are New Zealander (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Ghanaian (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Ugandan (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Guyana (11.4%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), South African (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and South American Indian (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% |
Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 88.3 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.4% |
Ugandans | 87.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 87.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.4% |
Kenyans | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.5% |
Ghanaians | 87.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.5% |