Jordanian vs Salvadoran Male Disability
COMPARE
Jordanian
Salvadoran
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Jordanians
Salvadorans
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Salvadoran Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,415,761 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,921,058 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.399 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.95%.
![Jordanian vs Salvadoran Male Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/male-disability/jordanians-vs-salvadorans-male-disability-chart.webp)
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Salvadoran |
Minimum | 5.0% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 23.2% | 19.1% |
Range | 18.1% | 16.2% |
Mean | 10.8% | 9.3% |
Median | 10.4% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 10.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Salvadorans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (10.4%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (10.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (10.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Tongan (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Israelis | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.3% |
South Americans | 99.6 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Salvadorans | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Peruvians | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Tongans | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |