Japanese vs Celtic Vision Disability
COMPARE
Japanese
Celtic
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Japanese
Celtics
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Celtic Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,077,012 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,807,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.43% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 14.1% | 12.3% |
Range | 13.7% | 11.9% |
Mean | 3.6% | 3.6% |
Median | 2.8% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 4.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Celtics by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Mexican American Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |