Inupiat vs Yuman Vision Disability
COMPARE
Inupiat
Yuman
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Inupiat
Yuman
2.7%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Yuman Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,318,866 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,661,627 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 12.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Yuman |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 10.0% | 20.5% |
| Range | 8.9% | 19.7% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 4.7% |
| Median | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Yuman by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), American (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Dominican (2.6%, a difference of 0.91%), Osage (2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Shoshone (2.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Apache (3.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Native/Alaskan (3.0%, a difference of 0.54%), Spanish American (2.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Colville (3.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and Central American Indian (3.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |