Inupiat vs Afghan Female Disability
COMPARE
Inupiat
Afghan
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Inupiat
Afghans
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Afghan Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,490 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,868,441 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.54%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Afghan |
Minimum | 3.4% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 17.8% |
Range | 26.9% | 12.3% |
Mean | 11.8% | 10.9% |
Median | 10.7% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 12.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Afghans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Peru (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Israeli (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Mongolian (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |