Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Ethiopian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Ethiopian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Ethiopians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Ethiopian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,788,572 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,073,982 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 2.5%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 0.34% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 12.0% | 3.4% |
Range | 11.7% | 3.2% |
Mean | 2.9% | 2.0% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 2.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 0.74% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 0.63% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 0.63% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ethiopians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Venezuelan (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Turkish (2.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Luxembourger (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Okinawan (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (2.2%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |