Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Albanian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Albanian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Albanians
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
19.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Albanian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,792,147 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,248,883 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Albanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 10.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Albanian |
Minimum | 0.34% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 24.9% | 14.9% |
Range | 24.5% | 13.9% |
Mean | 7.1% | 6.7% |
Median | 5.5% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 7.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Albanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |