Immigrants from Sudan vs Danish Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Danish
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Danes
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
72.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Danish Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,956,198 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,084,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Danish |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 59.3% |
| Range | 24.0% | 58.0% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 14.4% |
| Median | 11.6% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan and Danes by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Estonian (12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Romanian (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Moroccan (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Syrian (12.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Central America (12.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
| Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
| Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
| Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |
| Danes | 72.5 /100 | #157 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |