Immigrants from Spain vs Inupiat Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
Inupiat
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Inupiat
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs Inupiat Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,653,426 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,327,130 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 0.52%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | Inupiat |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 31.0% | 18.0% |
Range | 29.2% | 16.9% |
Mean | 7.3% | 5.4% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain and Inupiat by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |