Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tongan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Tongan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Tongans
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Tongan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,870,749 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 5.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Tongan |
Minimum | 0.18% | 0.94% |
Maximum | 13.0% | 16.9% |
Range | 12.9% | 16.0% |
Mean | 4.4% | 5.8% |
Median | 4.4% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Tongans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Iranian (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 0.97%), Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 0.99%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |