Immigrants from South Africa vs Bhutanese Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Bhutanese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Bhutanese
11.2%
DISABILITY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Bhutanese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,313,219 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,521,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.44%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.46% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 21.0% |
Range | 45.0% | 17.0% |
Mean | 14.2% | 11.5% |
Median | 11.7% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Bhutanese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Brazil (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Asia (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Ecuadorian (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Greece (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 98.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Palestinians | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 96.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 96.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.3% |