Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Fiji Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Immigrants from Fiji
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Immigrants from Fiji
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
77.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Fiji Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,834,739 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,738,910 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.381 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | Immigrants from Fiji |
Minimum | 0.87% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 18.5% | 3.9% |
Range | 17.7% | 2.5% |
Mean | 4.5% | 2.9% |
Median | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 3.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 0.61% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 0.54% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 0.53% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Fiji by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |