Immigrants from Philippines vs Greek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Greek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Philippines
Greeks
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines vs Greek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,065,462 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,531,888 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.622 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.31%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines | Greek |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 20.8% | 50.0% |
Range | 19.1% | 48.5% |
Mean | 6.6% | 11.2% |
Median | 6.0% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Greeks by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from Austria (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Maltese (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |