Immigrants from Peru vs Yugoslavian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
Yugoslavian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
Yugoslavians
16.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
71.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Peru vs Yugoslavian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,830,474 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 16.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,698,583 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 3.5%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Peru | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 28.9% | 26.1% |
| Range | 23.0% | 23.2% |
| Mean | 15.7% | 15.9% |
| Median | 15.8% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Pennsylvania German (16.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (16.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (16.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Austrian (16.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Bhutanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Soviet Union | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Bhutanese | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Romanians | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Venezuelans | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.0%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (17.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
| Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |