Immigrants from Pakistan vs Asian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Pakistan
Asian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Pakistan
Asians
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Pakistan vs Asian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,855,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 550,442,799 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Pakistan | Asian |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 16.3% | 9.5% |
Range | 14.3% | 7.7% |
Mean | 5.8% | 5.1% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 5.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Pakistan and Asians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from Australia (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |