Immigrants from Oceania vs Australian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Australian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Australians
17.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Australian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,496,536 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,142,484 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 2.5%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Australian |
Minimum | 10.5% | 7.1% |
Maximum | 29.7% | 28.9% |
Range | 19.2% | 21.7% |
Mean | 18.0% | 16.1% |
Median | 17.1% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.3% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Hawaiian (17.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Taiwanese (17.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from El Salvador (17.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Alaskan Athabascan (17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Okinawan (17.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Puget Sound Salish | 10.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.5% |
Alaska Natives | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 9.7 /100 | #207 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 9.3 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 8.5 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Taiwanese | 7.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 7.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.6% |
Hawaiians | 7.2 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 7.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 6.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.6% |
Okinawans | 6.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.6% |
Salvadorans | 6.7 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.6% |
Icelanders | 6.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are American (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |