Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Panama Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Immigrants from Panama
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Immigrants from Panama
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Panama Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,754,465 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,167,736 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.892 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 7.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Immigrants from Panama |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 7.4% | 24.8% |
Range | 6.1% | 23.7% |
Mean | 3.0% | 6.0% |
Median | 2.8% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 7.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.63% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belize (2.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Central Americans | 97.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Afghans | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |