Immigrants from Lithuania vs Danish Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Danish
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Danes
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Danish Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,698,570 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,117,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.43%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Danish |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 2.9% | 8.3% |
| Range | 1.7% | 7.8% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.43% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.43% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.42% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Danes by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Australia (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Korea (2.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sweden (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Burmese (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Korea (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Turkey (2.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |