Immigrants from Kenya vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kenya
Native/Alaskan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Kenya
Natives/Alaskans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kenya vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,040,031 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,663,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 46.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kenya | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 8.1% | 13.7% |
Range | 7.0% | 11.7% |
Mean | 3.2% | 6.0% |
Median | 2.9% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kenya by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |