Immigrants from Jordan vs Chilean Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Chilean
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Chileans
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Chilean Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,274,102 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.226 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,651,441 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.29%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Chilean |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 4.8% |
| Maximum | 17.5% | 26.7% |
| Range | 14.3% | 21.8% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 11.7% |
| Median | 11.1% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Chileans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Sierra Leonean (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Switzerland (11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Bhutanese (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Chile (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Colombian (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Colombians | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Chileans | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.6% |