Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Immigrants from Lithuania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Immigrants from Lithuania
2.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,631,543 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.317 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 11.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Minimum | 0.58% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 6.6% | 5.7% |
Range | 6.0% | 3.5% |
Mean | 2.5% | 3.3% |
Median | 2.4% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 3.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.92% | 0.86% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.92% | 0.85% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Immigrants from Western Africa (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from China (2.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Haitian (2.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Salvadoran (2.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Salvadorans | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Haitians | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.6% |
West Indians | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Senegalese | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Nigerians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Venezuelans | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |