Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Australia Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Australia
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Australia
17.7%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
2.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
76.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Australia Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,233,463 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,201,073 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 3.5%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Australia |
Minimum | 9.1% | 0.98% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 37.3% |
Range | 13.8% | 36.3% |
Mean | 16.7% | 15.9% |
Median | 17.4% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 19.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Central America (17.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (17.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Guatemalan (17.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Tongan (17.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Panamanian (17.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Central Americans | 4.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.7% |
Alsatians | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.7% |
Fijians | 3.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.7% |
Vietnamese | 3.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.7% |
Marshallese | 2.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 17.7% |
Mongolians | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 17.7% |
Guatemalans | 2.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 17.8% |
Tongans | 2.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 17.8% |
Panamanians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 17.8% |
Osage | 2.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 17.8% |
Spanish American Indians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 1.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Sri Lankan (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (17.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |