Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Chile Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
Immigrants from Chile
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Immigrants from Chile
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Chile Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,197,352 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.238 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,637,346 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Grenada | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 1.3% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 16.2% | 29.3% |
Range | 14.9% | 26.9% |
Mean | 10.4% | 12.2% |
Median | 11.2% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Chile by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Colombian (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Ecuadorian (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Guyana (10.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Zimbabwean (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Poland (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 98.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.6% |