Immigrants from Greece vs Immigrants from Congo Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Greece
Immigrants from Congo
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Greece
Immigrants from Congo
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
18.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Greece vs Immigrants from Congo Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,870,944 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Greece and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.732 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,115,389 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Greece | Immigrants from Congo |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 34.2% | 12.2% |
| Range | 32.5% | 12.0% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 2.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Greece by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Greece are Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |