Immigrants from England vs Creek Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Creek
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from England
Creek
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
62.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Creek Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,606,709 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 49.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Creek |
Minimum | 0.66% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 13.2% | 11.5% |
Range | 12.5% | 10.8% |
Mean | 3.6% | 4.5% |
Median | 2.5% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.3% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Icelander (2.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #159 | Good 2.1% |
Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |