Immigrants from England vs Austrian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Austrian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from England
Austrians
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
44.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Austrian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,842,020 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.950 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,962,555 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.070%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Austrian |
Minimum | 2.3% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 75.4% | 68.4% |
Range | 73.1% | 66.4% |
Mean | 13.3% | 12.4% |
Median | 8.2% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England and Austrians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |