Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Syrian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Syrian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Syrians
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Syrian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,616,873 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,278,347 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 13.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Asia | Syrian |
Minimum | 0.61% | 0.77% |
Maximum | 13.7% | 15.6% |
Range | 13.1% | 14.8% |
Mean | 5.1% | 6.5% |
Median | 4.8% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.96%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Croatia (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Austria (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |