Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Macedonian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Macedonian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Macedonians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Macedonian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,413,823 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,627,302 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Macedonian |
Minimum | 0.52% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 10.1% | 4.5% |
Range | 9.6% | 4.4% |
Mean | 2.6% | 1.9% |
Median | 1.9% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 2.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.79% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 0.73% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 0.73% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Macedonians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Argentina (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Laotian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Jordanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Somali (2.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |