Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Japanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Japanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Japanese
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Japanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,522 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,105,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 3.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Japanese |
Minimum | 0.83% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 13.9% | 11.9% |
Range | 13.0% | 11.1% |
Mean | 4.7% | 3.9% |
Median | 3.7% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 3.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Panamanian (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Romania (3.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Sweden (3.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 42.4 /100 | #180 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 41.5 /100 | #181 | Average 3.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 41.1 /100 | #182 | Average 3.0% |
Bulgarians | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 35.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 3.0% |