Immigrants from Cuba vs Polish Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Polish
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Poles
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
20.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
8.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Polish Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,981,608 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,308,086 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.94%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Polish |
| Minimum | 7.3% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 19.6% | 60.0% |
| Range | 12.3% | 57.9% |
| Mean | 12.0% | 15.3% |
| Median | 11.9% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Poles by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Croatian (12.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Basque (12.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Mexican (12.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and Swiss (12.4%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Belizean (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Italian (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Native Hawaiian (12.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bahamian (12.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
| Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
| Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
| Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
| Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
| Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
| Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
| Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
| British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |
| Europeans | 12.1 /100 | #219 | Poor 12.4% |
| Bahamians | 11.1 /100 | #220 | Poor 12.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 10.8 /100 | #221 | Poor 12.4% |
| Italians | 10.7 /100 | #222 | Poor 12.4% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 9.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Belizeans | 9.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 12.5% |
| Poles | 8.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.5% |