Immigrants from China vs Barbadian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Barbadian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Barbadians
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Barbadian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,848,702 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,286,079 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 27.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Barbadian |
Minimum | 0.61% | 0.77% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 13.4% |
Range | 12.3% | 12.7% |
Mean | 5.1% | 7.2% |
Median | 4.8% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Barbadians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Yaqui (6.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Pennsylvania German (6.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (6.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.8% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |